TheoTown

This idea isn't the most realistic one you'll see and I know that people will probably hate this idea, but what if when you run a power plant over it's maximum capacity for too long it turns into rubble. It might make situations like that more challenging.

That would be cool, maybe just for coal/nuclear plant, like if you run it above 90% for too long it will explode (coal plant just gets destroyed but nuclear plant causes explosion)

In real life there will.just be brownouts.

Both has been on our todo list for a long time:
1. Adding control to power production
2. Adding lifetime for power plants and water pumps

Lifetime? Meh, maybe your plants may break down and you have to pay to fix them?

Lobby wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2017, 15:48

Both has been on our todo list for a long time:
1. Adding control to power production
2. Adding lifetime for power plants and water pumps

I like the idea will be another reason to have nuclear plants away from everything

Lobby wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2017, 15:48

Both has been on our todo list for a long time:
1. Adding control to power production
2. Adding lifetime for power plants and water pumps

So do you mean I have to build a new one
After it breaks down in 20 years or so?

Yes, that's the idea behind it. Or maybe the option to repair it, who knows...

Maybe a few days before it stops working you will get a message "There is a problem with _____, it will cost xT to fix" and if you dont it breaks

Barky wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 16:30

Maybe a few days before it stops working you will get a message "There is a problem with _____, it will cost xT to fix" and if you dont it breaks

A couple of days is not enough time and BOOM !!!

Please, dont add that...

Why? No point in saying no and not giving a reason

Mg3094066 wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 17:07

Barky wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 16:30

Maybe a few days before it stops working you will get a message "There is a problem with _____, it will cost xT to fix" and if you dont it breaks

A couple of days is not enough time and BOOM !!!

That was just figure of speech, obviously it would be longer in game

But why?

It's helpful to give a reason because he can adjust it/change it to what you would prefer

Barky wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 17:34

Why? No point in saying no and not giving a reason

Let him give his opinion. After all his 1 in 4 post carries more weight than your 1 in 1000+ reply.

CommanderABab wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 19:16

Barky wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2017, 17:34

Why? No point in saying no and not giving a reason

Let him give his opinion. After all his 1 in 4 post carries more weight than your 1 in 1000+ reply.

All I ment is I wanted to know why he didnt like it, maybe it's something that can be adjusted and would be a good idea, for all we know it might be an epic idea but he didnt say it

I agree with the breakdown for years thing, but add repair please. Or just add warnings 3 years before the power plant will be completely unusable, so we can build another one.

Breakdowns is good idea